20230913 082102 00001

Israel Protests Outside Supreme Court as it Decides on Judicial Overhaul

Israel’s supreme Court judges have started hearings on petitions challenging a critical component of the rightwing government’s controversial judicial overhaul. This overhaul, pointed toward restricting the powers of the supreme Court, has started mass protests, strikes, and deep divisions within Israeli society.

The central focus of these hearings is the “reasonableness” clause, passed by the Knesset in July, which effectively eliminated the Supreme Court’s authority to overrule government decisions. The result of these procedures conveys the possibility to ignite an unprecedented constitutional crisis in Israel.

Israel Protests Outside Supreme Court as it Decides on Judicial Overhaul

Also Read: Tibetans Protest at Delhi against China Ahead of G20 Summit

For the first time in history, each of the 15 supreme Court judges gathered to deliberate on eight petitions seeking the annulment of the “reasonableness” clause. This clause, a cornerstone of the judicial overhaul, has become a flashpoint in the battle over the separation of powers in Israel’s democracy.

The court’s capacity to strike down government actions deemed “unreasonable” has been a fundamental check on executive authority, and its potential nullification marks a significant shift in the balance of power.

The hearings push the nation’s top judges into the extraordinary position of determining the scope of their own roles and powers. It is significant that the government has communicated its aim to oppose consistence should the court invalidate the law.

This would address an unprecedented showdown between the judiciary and the executive branch and has raised concerns about the possibility of civil unrest and even civil war.

The protests outside the supreme Court working in Jerusalem, as the hearings started, were a testament to the gravity of the situation.

Also Read: North Korea Unveils First Nuclear-Armed Submarine

Demonstrators, numbering in the hundreds, gathered with drums, whistles, and Israeli flags, echoing their concerns about the government’s encroachment on the judicial branch’s independence.

The continuous dispute has driven Israel to the edge of a constitutional crisis. Critics argue that the government’s judicial overhaul is a thinly veiled power grab that threatens democratic norms and serves Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s personal interests, including his fight against corruption charges.

Netanyahu introduced sweeping judicial changes when he returned to office in December, in response to the demands of his coalition partners.

The proposed changes incorporate restricting the court’s power to overturn regulations and granting politicians greater control over judicial appointments.

These actions have started shock among the people who accept they undermine democratic checks and balances and erode the foundations of Israeli democracy.

Also Read: Mali: At Least 49 Civilians Killed in Attack on River Boat

Additionally, they have caused divisions inside Israeli society, spreading over across religious, ethnic, and class lines, and have garnered concern from international allies, including the United States.

In the midst of this wild political environment, organizations like the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, along with 37 other human rights organizations, have filed amicus briefs with the Supreme Court. They contend that the aggregate effect of these changes and laws threatens the country’s democratic structures.

The court’s decision, expected inside the following four months, will be firmly examined for initial clues about the justices’ leanings. The panel of judges includes both liberals and conservatives, and their decision will carry significant implications for Israel’s political future.

Supreme Court Chief Justice Esther Hayut, addressing the government’s legal representatives during the hearings, questioned the accountability of the government’s actions.

She emphasized the importance of ensuring that government decisions are indeed reasonable and serve the public interest, highlighting the critical role of the court in this process.

Also Read: BA.2.86 Variant: UK Confirms 34 COVID Cases in Norfolk

Sources Related to Judicial Overhaul Bill (For R&D)

    Top Sources Related to Israel Protests Outside Supreme Court as it Decides on Judicial Overhaul (For R&D)

    The Guardian:

    Washington Post:


    AP News:


    Arab News:


    More From Author