British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s controversial Rwanda Bill has stirred debate and international attention. Passed by the British Parliament, the legislation aims to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda while their applications are processed, in a bid to deter illegal migration across the English Channel.
Also Read: India Becomes Second Largest Source of New US Citizens
The Rwanda bill was first proposed by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2022 to address the influx of migrants crossing the English Channel.
Legal challenges and opposition hindered its implementation. The passage of the bill shows a political victory for Sunak’s government despite facing fierce criticism from various quarters.
The Rwanda Bill compels judges to recognize Rwanda as a “safe third country” and grants ministers the authority to disregard certain sections of international and British human rights law.
Under the legislation, asylum seekers arriving in Britain illegally after January 1, 2022, could be deported to Rwanda.
The United Nations has urged Britain to reconsider its plans, citing concerns about the rule of law and setting a dangerous precedent.
Human rights groups have criticized the bill highlighting allegations of political repression in Rwanda under President Paul Kagame’s regime. Legal experts argue that the legislation may still be subject to challenges under international law.
The Rwanda bill faced legal setbacks including a ruling by the UK Supreme Court declaring it unlawful.
Sunak’s government hopes that the new legislation will address previous legal concerns and make the way for deportation flights to Rwanda.
Britain has already allocated huge funds to Rwanda, with payments totaling £240 million by the end of 2023. Rwanda’s capacity to accommodate deported migrants remains limited.
Prime Minister Sunak has reaffirmed his commitment to deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda addressing the need to deter illegal crossings and disrupt human smuggling networks. The government aims to initiate deportation flights within 10 to 12 weeks of the bill’s passage.
Also Read: Victory for Mohamed Muizzu’s PNC in Maldives Parliamentary Elections
Opposition parties, charities, and human rights organizations have condemned the Rwanda plan as inhumane and unlawful.
They advocate for alternative measures such as strengthening border security targeting criminal networks, and establishing fast-track asylum processing systems within the UK.
The Rwanda bill was initially proposed by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in 2022 as a means to disrupt the operations of human smugglers and dissuade migrants from the dangerous journeys to Britain.
The UN has voiced strong objections to the deportation plan, citing concerns about its legality for the rule of law.
Previous legal rulings including a decision by the UK Supreme Court have deemed aspects of the scheme unlawful.
While the UK government has allocated funds, totaling £240 million by the end of 2023, to facilitate the deportation initiative, questions persist regarding Rwanda’s capacity to accommodate deported migrants.
With logistical challenges and uncertainties surrounding the feasibility of large-scale deportations doubts linger regarding the practicality of the plan.
The passage of the Rwanda Bill has started fierce debates within Parliament showing deep divisions within the Conservative Party and drawing criticism from opposition parties and civil society groups.
Some argue that the deportation scheme is inhumane and undermines fundamental principles of international law and human rights.
Also Read: Maxwell Azzarello Sets himself on Fire during Trump Trial in New York
